In 2024, TBCR reviewers continue to make outstanding contributions to the peer review process. They demonstrated professional effort and enthusiasm in their reviews and provided comments that genuinely help the authors to enhance their work.
Hereby, we would like to highlight some of our outstanding reviewers, with a brief interview of their thoughts and insights as a reviewer. Allow us to express our heartfelt gratitude for their tremendous effort and valuable contributions to the scientific process.
June, 2024
Simone Nardin, University of Genoa, Italy
June, 2024
Simone Nardin
Simone Nardin graduated from the University of Eastern Piedmont under the guidance of Professor Alessandra Gennari. Currently, he is a fellow in medical oncology at the University of Genoa, under the mentorship of Professor Lucia Del Mastro and Professor Matteo Lambertini, while working at IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino as an intern in the oncology department. His principal research areas are related to breast cancer, especially issues concerning young women and early treatment. Recent projects, worthy of ESMO Breast Cancer 2024 merit, focus on adjuvant endocrine therapy for premenopausal women and the role of GnRH analogs for these patients. Connect with him on LinkedIn.
In Dr. Nardin’s opinion, the peer-review system is essential to ensure high standards during the publication process, as it is not feasible for editors to adequately assess the quality of every submitted manuscript. However, there are limitations, such as potential biases, lengthy review times, and variability in the quality of reviews. The blind peer-review method can help mitigate potential conflicts of interest or undue influence between reviewers and authors. Additionally, employing advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence to assist in initial manuscript assessments could be useful as an initial step.
According to Dr. Nardin, a reviewer should possess several key qualities. Patience is crucial, as authors spend months producing and submitting their manuscripts, and reviewers must carefully evaluate all aspects of the work to suggest substantial improvements when necessary. Moreover, reviewers should have a strong understanding of the subject matter, attention to detail, and the ability to provide constructive and unbiased feedback.
Dr. Nardin believes that peer reviewing is a vital component of the scientific process, ensuring the accuracy, quality, and integrity of published research. He adds, “Contributing to this process allows me to play a crucial role in advancing knowledge within my field. This process helps me stay updated with the latest research and developments, which can inform and inspire my work, fostering continuous learning and professional growth. Lastly, it also sharpens my critical thinking and analytical skills, as I must rigorously evaluate the methodologies, data, and conclusions presented in manuscripts.”
(by Lareina Lim, Brad Li)
